Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Mortgage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mortgage. Show all posts

Thursday, January 10, 2013

[Three Cents Worth NY #187] Manhattan Mortgage Rates Are Listing

Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 11:11 PM
Comments Off

It’s time to share my Three Cents Worth on Curbed NY, at the intersection of neighborhood and real estate in the capitol of the world. And I’m simply here to take measurements.

Read today’s 3CW post on Curbed New York:

By far the three most popular observations about the Manhattan housing market to date in 2012 are: “mortgage rates are at historic lows” and “listing inventory is tight” and…ok, there are just two that are worthy.

I thought I’d mash them together and see what happened since I’ve never made the direct association. Admittedly I was surprised with the visual that resulted….


[click to expand]


View the original article here

Monday, January 7, 2013

Yes, Mortgage Rates Impact Housing Prices

Posted by Jonathan Miller - Wednesday, December 26, 2012, 4:50 PM

I few weeks ago I was dressed down by an analytics friend of mine who is in the business. Based on his employment and housing sales analysis in Alabama (I’ve never been) he suggested my comments about mortgage rates influencing housing prices as anecdotal and hypocritical (who says analysts have to have tact) – that only employment can be correlated. And further…since mortgage rates can not be proved to influence housing sales through multiple regression, any such claims are hearsay and anecdotal. While I agree that housing’s largest influence comes from employment, I was a bit surprised by the out-of-left-field agita I inspired.

He was focused on the predictive element of a trend versus a knee jerk reaction to a sudden change in a metric. My comment about a spike in mortgage rates at this moment (not predicting it) as ending the party – is apparently what caused him to lose faith in my analysis. Appreciative of the constructive feedback, I whipped up a couple of US macro price charts.

Yes, US employment trends correlate with US housing prices and mortgage rates correlate by showing an inverse trend against housing prices.

Predictive? Only if considered with other metrics.
Anecdotal? Hardly.






View the original article here

Friday, January 4, 2013

Mortgage Recovery Still Rocky

BofA CEO on Future of Home Ownership "We changed our position to be direct to consumers," said Brian Moynihan, Bank of America president & CEO, discussing changes in his company's mortgage business, with CNBC's Diana Olick.

The trouble is, the banks are close to finishing their obligations under the settlement, and the largest, Bank of America, will not continue to offer principal reduction afterward.

"The programs then going forward will provide for similar relief, but I think we have offered principal reduction to all our borrowers — all the people we own, the asset that we can actually offer to that's been done," said Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan in an interview last week.

Another report Friday from Lender Processing Services showed a monthly increase in the U.S. loan delinquency rate in November. As it stands now, 7.12 percent of loans are 30-plus days past due, but not yet in foreclosure, and 3.51 percent are in the foreclosure process. Add it up and 5.35 million loans are still in some kind of trouble, according to LPS, as big banks finish their obligations under the settlement.

—By CNBC's Diana Olick; Follow her on Twitter @Diana_Olick or on Facebook at facebook.com/DianaOlickCNBC

Questions? Comments? RealtyCheck@cnbc.com


View the original article here

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Will Fed's Mortgage Buying Juice the Housing Recovery?

Home prices are stabilizing, and new construction is bouncing back, but apparently the U.S. Federal Reserve isn't buying a bullish housing recovery. 

Its announcement Thursday that it would buy up to $40 billion in agency mortgage-backed securities every month, with no clear finish line, says loud and clear that the Fed thinks housing needs more stimulus. (Read More: Fed Pulls Trigger, to Buy Mortgages in Effort to Lower Rates.)

Mortgage rates are already hovering near record lows, but mortgage applications, especially to purchase a home, have been weak. So many have refinanced already at low rates, and so many more are unable to refinance because of lack of home equity or high fees. 

As for home buying, the real growth in that area this year has been among investors on the low end, largely using all cash.

Supplies of foreclosed properties have been shrinking dramatically, as those investors swarm auctions and bid on bulk deals. (Read More: How Investors Are Skewing Home Price Recovery.)

The hot and still heating rental market offers potentially more rewards than the volatile stock market.

In turn, all that activity on the distressed end is pushing up home prices. While overall foreclosure activity is falling, we could see volumes of bank-owned properties for sale rising over the next few months, as banks look to take advantage of rising demand and prices.

We are already seeing spikes in foreclosures activity in states where these cases had been backed up in the courts.

“Bucking the national trend, deferred foreclosure activity boiled over in several states in August,” said Daren Blomquist, vice president of RealtyTrac. “In judicial states such as Florida, Illinois, New Jersey and New York, this was a continuation of a trend we’ve been seeing for several months now. The increases in Florida and Illinois pushed foreclosure rates in those states to the two highest in the country — supplanting the non-judicial states of Arizona, California, Georgia and Nevada. Previous to August, the nation’s top two state foreclosure rates have been from those four non-judicial states every month since December 2010."

As more of these properties come to market, investors will likely prevail, despite many potential owner occupants looking to get in on good deals. Again, this is because investors have the cash advantage. Even low mortgage rates won't help some potential buyers, because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are still increasing guarantee fees, which push rates higher. They could, however, mitigate some of the fee hikes.

"For everyday homeowners, QE3 should work to suppress mortgage rates at a time when they're artificially increasing. QE3 will offset the majority of the FHFA's new g-fees, and will help keep FHA loans affordable despite rising mortgage insurance premiums," argued Dan Green of Waterstone Mortgage.

But there is also plenty of uncertainty about the future of mortgage financing, depending on the outcome of the November election, not to mention action the current administration is taking to shrink Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (Read More: 'Wind Down' of Fannie, Freddie: 'Positive for Housing'?)

"One new wrinkle is the recent announcement that Fannie and Freddie will be required to shrink their own retained MBS portfolios faster than expected," noted Guy Cecala of Inside Mortgage Finance. "This could slightly dilute the impact of the Fed's action since its increased purchases may be offset by less GSE purchases."

To see the low interest rates are not the housing cure-all, one need look no further than weekly mortgage applications numbers, which have been lackluster of late to say the least. The one benefit could be in the refinance segment of the market, especially as there is a new push to broaden the administration's current refinance program for underwater borrowers. More refinances mean more money in consumers' pockets. Unfortunately the Democrat-led effort is unlikely to make its way into reality, given the rising Republican opposition as election day nears.

No question more and more Americans will be turning to the housing market this fall, as home ownership is now cheaper than renting in all of the 100 largest U.S. markets, "by a wide margin," according to a new report from Trulia.com. (Read More: As Housing Recovers, Will Apartment Boom End?)

What remains to be seen is how many potential buyers will be able to take advantage of these low rates, given the still tight lending standards that rule today's market.

—By CNBC's Diana Olick

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Saturday, September 29, 2012

How Does the Fed Help My House, My Mortgage?

For those of you who expected to wake up to a 30-year fixed rate mortgage below 3 percent, you may as well go back to sleep.

Yes, rates moved down, 0.125 percent, according to several sources, but that was not as low as some had predicted. Remember, we hit the low of 3.49 percent in July, but then we jumped back into the mid to high threes. (Read More: Fed Pulls Trigger, to Buy Mortgages in Effort to Lower Rates.)

“Short term, people who are thinking about moving really need to lock in,” says Craig Strent of Maryland-based Apex Home Loans. He is concerned that the strong consumer sentiment number that came in today could cause the Federal Reserve to pull back on its buying in the future. “When this thing turns, it’s going to be fast. Just pulling back a little sends a message,” adds Strent.

But others argue that the housing market is still on such shaky ground that that’s unlikely to happen. Mortgage applications to purchase a home have declined five of the last six months, according to Diane Swonk of Mesirow Financial.

“I think that this will be a trillion dollar commitment from the Fed,” said Swonk on CNBC’s "Squawk on the Street." “Home values appreciating, that’s something very important in this economy getting more legs and moving forward more rapidly.” (You can watch the interview here.)

So say mortgage rates could dip lower than the latest record, perhaps to around 3.25 percent. How does that help me? Does it boost my home price? (Read More: Will Fed's Mortgage Buying Juice the Housing Recovery?)

On the one hand, lower mortgage rates give potential buyers more purchasing power. “A 0.125 percent drop in rates adds 1.5 percent to your maximum purchase price (given all the other fees),” according to Dan Green at Waterstone Mortgage. “Assuming a mortgage payment of $1500, that’s the difference between $404,800 and $411,000-ish.” So that is how much more house you can buy. If people can buy more house, then perhaps home prices will rise.

But as we’ve noted so many times before, the great low rate doesn’t mean anything if you can’t qualify, if you don’t have the down payment or credit scores to get it.

“Instead, the underlying improvement in housing demand is still very reliant on cash buyers and investors,” notes Paul Diggle of Capital Economics, who does not believe mortgage rates will fall dramatically. “Admittedly, low bond yields and savings rates more generally are probably playing a part in the strength of investor demand for housing.”

Lower rates could cause a boost in refinances, but so many have already refied at record low rates that it would take a pretty large drop to lure more in, given the fees and hassle involved. And of course negative equity keeps millions of potential refinancers out of the game. The government’s refinance program for underwater borrowers (HARP) has helped over half a million borrowers get lower rates since the beginning of this year, but unless you have a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac [FNMA  Loading...      ()   ] backed loan, you’re not eligible.

There is a push by Democrats in Congress to expand the government’s refi program, and lower mortgage rates could help more Republicans come on board, but that is unlikely to happen before election day. (Read More: Wealthiest Counties Rake In Government-Backed Mortgages)

“To ensure as many voters as possible can benefit from this, we believe there will be another push to enact HARP expansion legislation during the lame duck session that will start after the election,” says Jaret Seiberg of Guggenheim Partners. “Lower mortgage rates only matter if people can refinance and plow that extra cash into the economy. Given that as many as a quarter of borrowers may be underwater, the HARP is the way to translate the Federal Reserve’s effort into economic stimulus.”

It is hard to say now just how low rates will go and just who will be able to benefit from lower mortgage rates. In today’s tricky housing recovery, so dependent on investors and so sensitive to a still-swollen pipeline of foreclosed properties and delinquent loans, mortgage rates are just one piece of the recovery puzzle.

Sector Watch - Nation's Biggest Mortgage Lenders:

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Saturday, May 5, 2012

[Three Cents Worth NY #187] Manhattan Mortgage Rates Are Listing

Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 11:11 PM
No Comments

It’s time to share my Three Cents Worth on Curbed NY, at the intersection of neighborhood and real estate in the capitol of the world. And I’m simply here to take measurements.

Read today’s 3CW post on Curbed New York:

By far the three most popular observations about the Manhattan housing market to date in 2012 are: “mortgage rates are at historic lows” and “listing inventory is tight” and…ok, there are just two that are worthy.

I thought I’d mash them together and see what happened since I’ve never made the direct association. Admittedly I was surprised with the visual that resulted….


[click to expand]


View the original article here

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Rising Mortgage Rates May Not Hurt Housing

It was barely a few weeks ago that mortgage rates were sitting at record lows.

The idea of rates over 4 percent on the 30-year fixed seemed a distant memory.

And here they are now at 4.05 percent on the Bankrate.com overnight, thanks to the recent rise in Treasury yields.

The housing market, it seems, just can't catch a break. Or can it?

As the economy improves, the job market improves, and that is a key driver for housing. But on the flip side, as the economy improves, investors finally crawl out of the Treasury bunkers, driving yields higher, and mortgage rates generally follow the 10-year Treasury.

"We will definitely see a freeze up in refi’s immediately but the decision on a purchase still won’t be impacted until rates get at least to 4.5 percent I believe," says Peter Boockvar at Miller Tabak. "Assuming a $200k mortgage, going from 4 to 4.5 percent in mortgage rate adds about $60 per month to one’s payments, and while an extra $700 per year matters, I’m not sure if it’s a deal breaker."

While rates have moved a good quarter of a percent in the past few weeks, most analysts don't think they'll go much higher.

"Mortgage rates were too high anyway ,relative to the 10-year Treasury, so I don't think you will see a parallel shift," says FBR's Paul Miller, who spoke to several bankers today. They told him mortgage volume is good, which helps keep rates competitive. "But it does take time for this stuff to flow through the markets," he adds.

And then there could be one other phenomenon, as described by Freddie Mac's chief economist Frank Nothaft: "When rates tick up, you may see some potential home buyers who have been sitting on the sidelines, suddenly they may get up, as they are concerned that maybe this is the beginning of a trend, and they don't want to miss out on these 60-year low mortgage rates. In the near term it can encourage buyers."

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Friday, February 17, 2012

As Mortgage Refinancings Surge, Banks Struggle

Barely two weeks into a new government program that allows severely underwater borrowers with loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to refinance their loans to lower rates, the numbers are surging.

Applications to refinance jumped 9.4 percent last week, seasonally adjusted, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Record low interest rates on the thirty-year fixed, averaging 4.05 percent, are only adding fuel to the fire.

“There was a lot of pent up demand,” said Bank of America spokesman Terry Francisco of the recently revamped Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP 2). The newest incarnation removes the cap on negative equity, so borrowers who owe more than 125 percent of their home’s current value can now qualify. These so-called severely underwater borrowers, however, must be current on their payments.

The new surge backed up the phone lines at Bank of America [BAC  Loading...      ()   ] , with some borrowers reporting they heard a message suggesting they call back in six to nine months. Francisco confirms the lender has temporarily stopped taking applications for cash-out refinances because of the additional underwriting those loans require. Cash-out accounts for 10-15 percent of their mortgage business.

“We’re taking a lot of applications for HARP 2 and straight refi’s as well, so we needed to curb our demand in some way,” Francisco said.

Wells Fargo [WFC  Loading...      ()   ] also reports an increase in refinancing right after the holidays, as well as an overall increase in 2011. “From January of last year through January of this year, Wells Fargo has seen its refinancing volume more than double,” says a spokesman, who adds that it’s too early to tell about the impact of HARP 2, as record low interest rates are a key factor in demand. Wells Fargo, however, has not suspended any of its lending.

The refinance share of mortgage activity is now 80.5 percent of total applications.

Applications for mortgages to purchase a home were flat last week and have been basically flat now for a month, which is not a promising sign for home sales. President Obama last week announced yet another government refinance program to help underwater borrowers who do not have Fannie or Freddie-backed loans. The plan could cost $5-10 billion and requires Congressional approval; some have called it dead on arrival.

Strong refinance activity means more money in consumers’ pockets and potentially more debt reduction, as some borrowers opt for fixed-rate amortizing loans as opposed to interest-only adjustable rate mortgages. Unfortunately, the flip side, which is lower applications to purchase a home, does not bode well for housing’s fledgling recover. “The latest weakness of mortgage applications for home purchase may suggest that the recent improvement in home sales is not built on solid foundations,” says Paul Diggle of Capital Economics.

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Monday, February 6, 2012

President Obama Proposes Mortgage Refinances for 'Responsible Borrowers'

After several largely ineffective programs to help troubled borrowers and after fruitless attempts at budging the hard-line conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, President Obama is proposing a brand new refinance program for borrowers who are current on their mortgages, regardless of who owns their loan; the catch is that this one has to go through Congress.

Property Tax

"I'm sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks," the President announced in his State of the Union address.

Unlike previous efforts in the refinance space, including a recently revamped and expanded government program for borrowers who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth, this plan would not be limited to those with loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to senior administration officials. The two mortgage giants own or guarantee about half of the nation's mortgages. It would be open to all borrowers current on their loans.

The Obama administration is offering precious few details, promising more in the coming weeks, but several sources say the plan is to ask Congress to allow the government mortgage insurer, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), to back refinances of underwater mortgages. No estimates were given as to how many borrowers such a plan could potentially help, only that this would be a voluntary, borrower-initiated plan, and not a blanket refinance of all borrowers.

The costs, according to administration officials, would be modest, and the President would request that a portion of his financial crisis responsibility fee offset any of those costs, so there would be no addition to the federal debt. 

"A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won't add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust," Mr. Obama added.

Loan servicers could be faced with a flood of applications and could have to add resources to handle it all, but officials say the opportunity to generate revenues from the refinances would be incentive enough. Still many servicers have balked at the idea of mass refinancing, as the new loans could present more risk and less reward.

The idea is to remove the barriers and "frictions" that have kept many borrowers out of refinancing to historically low rates. Some of those include high levels of negative equity, loan level price adjustments, loan origination dates, put-backs on loans that default, and borrower qualifications.

Then there is the very basic problem of politics. Whatever the details of the plan are, Republicans, despite the fact that they have been calling for more refinances, are unlikely to hand President Obama a popular victory on the eve of a presidential election. They may also oppose anything that makes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bigger, when the two are allegedly winding down.

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');and follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

US Treasury Forcing Mortgage Principal Forgiveness

Peter Gridley | Photographer's Choice | Getty Images

Late Friday the U.S. Treasury Department announced a major expansion of its Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP).

The three-year-old program has been largely deemed unsuccessful, as it has provided just about 750,000 borrowers with permanent loan modifications. The initial expectation from government officials was that it would help three to four million borrowers.

“Clearly the initial program erred on the side of making sure taxpayers were protected, but it didn’t do enough to help the overall economy,” said Michael Barr, former Asst. Treasury Secretary for Financial Institutions and one of HAMP’s original architects.

Now taxpayers will pony up the cash, as Treasury is tripling the financial incentives to lenders and opening the program up to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and investors in rental properties. The money would come out of TARP funds, i.e. from the taxpayers. We still don’t know if Fannie and Freddie will participate, since their conservator, the FHFA’s Ed DeMarco, has been actively fighting principal write down for years. A week ago he sent a letter to members of congress explaining the math behind his argument. 

But the Treasury may be forcing DeMarco’s hand. He claimed that writing down mortgage principal would cost $4 billion more than the modifications that Fannie and Freddie are doing now. Those involve interest rate reduction and principal forbearance. The newly expanded HAMP, however, with its triple- sized cash incentives, would shore up that $4 billion hole. Funny how he mentioned that hole on Monday, and the Treasury announced the new plan Friday.

“If he [DeMarco] doesn’t get to yes, then he has no political leg to stand on,” says FBR’s Ed Mills, who estimates the enhanced program could add one million borrowers to its ranks. Mills says a ‘no’ from DeMarco would enable the Obama Administration to replace him, which it tried to do once before, only to be blocked by members of Congress.

“It would be an appropriate response for him to do it,” says Barr of DeMarco. “I do think they should participate.”

I asked Barr why the Treasury waited three years to use the TARP funds for principal reduction. The obvious answer is that this is presidential election year, and the housing market is still floundering, but Barr claims the Treasury was just being careful.

“It’s a use of taxpayer funds, and you want to make sure you’re not providing more of an incentive than is required,” he said. “One person’s successful program is another person’s bailout.”

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Sunday, December 18, 2011

What Are Buyers Really Putting Down for a Mortgage?

Ask the Realtors, the Builders, even the Housing Reporters, and they'll all tell you that the biggest impediments to housing's recovery are higher credit underwriting standards. Mortgage application

Down payments are a big part of that, as most mortgage market experts will say you can't get those great low rates today without putting down at least 20 percent, and more if you need a jumbo loan.

That's why a new report from LendingTree listing the states with the highest and lowest average mortgage down payments was so surprising to me. It wasn't the states, but the cash down.

New Jersey came in with the highest average, but that average was just 13.76 percent, according to LendingTree. North Dakota boasts the lowest average at 12.29 percent. Still both are well below the 20 percent we all complain about.

Granted FHA (Federal Housing Administration) loans, which due to the government insurance, require very low down payments, and while they rose to a very large share of the market during the worst years of the housing crash, they have since fallen back to an approximately 20 percent share of originations today.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac require at least 10 percent down, but then you have to pay private mortgage insurance to get the best rates.

"The reality is when you put less than 20 percent down, you have to pay for some kind of insurance to protect the lender from the higher risk that you'll default...but private mortgage insurers these days aren't always willing to do business with low down payments," notes a LendingTree spokesman.

If average down payments are this low, it raises concern over proposed mortgage industry regulation that would require a 20 percent down payment for a lender to be able to securitize and sell a loan fully into the marketplace. Lenders, like LendingTree, don't like it.

"If Federal regulators were to adopt the proposed 20 percent down payment requirement, a majority of borrowers wouldn’t be able to meet the standard given the findings in this report," said Doug Lebda, founder and CEO of LendingTree.

But what if the average that LendingTree is reporting, isn't what it appears to be?

"What we know is that 20-25 percent of mortgages nationwide carry down payments of 3.5 percent or less (FHA or VA) while most of the rest carry down payments of 20 percent or more (Fannie, Freddie and jumbo)," notes Guy Cecala of Inside Mortgage Finance. "So an average of 12 or 14 percent is not impossible, but it doesn't really mean that a lot of people are actually getting mortgages with those "average" down payments."

Don't you just hate it when real math gets in the way of a good lobby?

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Friday, October 28, 2011

Low Mortgage Rates are a Ruse—Nice if You Can Get 'Em

Mortgage rates down

For weeks now we've been touting new record-low rates on 15- and 30-year fixed mortgages.

They're floating around four percent, dipping below four when Europe explodes, then back just above four percent this week, as the stock market makes a turnaround.

Whatever the exact daily rate, the message is that the rates are a steal, and they should make home refinancing and home buying a steal.

Not so much.

The problem is that these low rates are not going to the borrowers who need them the most, and even worse, these rates should actually be lower than they are.

“When there’s a rush of refinancers, lenders become flooded with volume and can adjust rates to slow their pipelines and increase margins,” says LendingTree Chairman and CEO Doug Lebda. “It becomes a matter of supply and demand, which unfortunately means borrowers are seeing higher rates than what’s being reported.”

Lending Tree looked at spreads between the 10-year treasury rate and the average national rate on the 30-year fixed a few weeks ago, when rates were nearing record lows.

"The 10-year treasury rate was at 1.88 percent, while the average national [mortgage] rate was at 4.03 percent. An alarming 215 basis point spread (compared to the 153 average basis point spread seen over the past 10 years) means that the full benefit of these low rates aren’t getting to consumers."

While mortgage volume is at historically low levels, there has also been a mass exodus of mortgage lenders from the market, partially due to new government compensation policies that went into effect last Spring.

"It had the effect of driving some of the best and most qualified loan officers out of the business," says Lebda.

To make matters worse, the consumers who are getting the best rates are those who need those low rates the least.

"Two of every three mortgage refinancings done by banks and guaranteed by the GSEs since 2008 have gone to higher income households," writes Christopher Whalen of Institutional Risk Analytics, who also notes that the bulk of refis have gone to newer, "higher coupon" loans.

"The behavior of the GSEs and the top four banks – JP Morgan [JPM  Loading...      ()   ] , Bank of America [BAC  Loading...      ()   ] , Citigroup [C  Loading...      ()   ] and Wells Fargo [WFC  Loading...      ()   ] – which prevent lower income Americans with performing loans to exercise their contractual right to refinance borders on the criminal," adds Whalen in a blog on Reuters.com.

Despite a bump up in rates last week, there was a near 10 percent surge in government refinance applications, that is FHA loans. That's because borrowers who are turned down for Fannie and Freddie loans are moved to FHA, which has lower down payment and credit requirements.

The government is supposedly now mulling a program to get more borrowers refinanced at low rates through Fannie and Freddie, but given everything I've just noted, the practical hurdles to that will likely be insurmountable. Don't get me started on the political hurdles.

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick

View the original article here

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Mortgage Rate Spreads Widen

Mortgage Loan StatementTom Grill | Photographer's Choice RF | Getty ImagesI can't get off the phone with anyone I know without first having to hear about their particular mortgage story; Okay, maybe that's an exaggeration, but not that far off.

The first I heard this morning was about a mortgage broker in Annapolis who is so busy he can't answer all the phone calls coming in.

That is because more borrowers are rushing to refinance yet again, as mortgage rates dipped on bad news last week in the world economy and the Federal Reserve's announcement that it would get back into the business of buying mortgage backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

It's not a sign that home buying is surging.

What was more interesting was the phone call with a producer at CNBC this afternoon, who told me that she is trying to refinance but getting wildly different rate offers from the different lenders she has contacted. This story jibed with a release from Lending Tree today saying that the spreads between the average and lowest mortgage interest rates are widening.

“We’re seeing about an eighty-four basis point difference between the average rate and lowest rates offered, the largest spread since LendingTree began tracking the data," says Doug Lebda, LendingTree's CEO. "That’s about a $125 difference in monthly mortgage payments on an average home loan, or $1,500 per year that borrowers could be saving on their mortgage payments."

Why are the spreads widening?

My guess is it's all about the credit quality, or lack thereof, of today's borrowers.

There are just a huge number of people who are unable to qualify for super low rates, so when lenders see really qualified borrowers, perhaps they're willing to offer them a better rate because that loan is so much more desirable. A borrower with good credit will find an increasingly competitive rate landscape.

There is plenty of evidence that overly tight mortgage underwriting is holding back a robust recovery in housing. Just look at the mortgage application volume to buy a home versus interest rates on the 30-year fixed. Despite rates dropping precipitously for the last six month and staying at near record loans, applications are holding relatively steady and even falling slightly.

Source: Mortgage Bankers Association

And then there's the fact that nearly a third of home buyers in August were all-cash, and that share is in fact rising yet again. Mortgage industry types I talk to say the banks do want to lend, they're just forced into strict guidelines by Fannie, Freddie and the FHA that make their pool of potential customers smaller. I realize that's not great for the mortgage business, or, given what got us here in the first place, is it?

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Saturday, September 17, 2011

How Low Can Mortgage Rates Go?

David Papazian | Brand X Pictures | Getty ImagesWhat's the bright side to a 200 point drop in the Dow? Yet another rush to Treasuries that pushes the 10-year yield below two percent; that, in turn, means even lower mortgage rates, right?

Maybe not this time.

Mortgage rates are already hovering near historic lows, with the 30-year-fixed heading toward four percent, but unlike home prices, experts tell me mortgage rates do have a bottom...a bank-imposed bottom.

Why?

"Because they [banks] don't have to go lower on the rates to get business and because they make more money if they don't go to the lower market rate," says Guy Cecala of Inside Mortgage Finance. "It's also a way to manage a potential flood of refi calls."

Craig Strent over at Apex Home Loans agrees: "I think part of the reason they are not going lower is because lenders are already inundated with refi applications and cannot handle another tidal wave."

The refinance share of mortgage applications was hovering around 80 percent a few weeks ago, but fell to 78 percent last week, even despite low interest rates. Those who can refi to their advantage, largely already have. Far too many borrowers are too far underwater on their mortgages to qualify for a refi.

Still, seeing rates go under that emotional 4 percent will push more borrowers to apply for refi's. Unfortunately low interest rates have not spurred home buying, and that's why the big banks are in no hurry to entice with even lower rates.

"Lenders would much prefer home purchase loans, which have a much lower fallout rate than refi's," says Cecala.

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Mortgage Interest Deduction Big in Budget Play

It's not like the housing market needs any more headwinds, so here's the government potentially giving us another: The mortgage interest deduction is back in big play in the budget deal.

It never exactly came off the table, but the bigger the budget deal, the more likely the mortgage deduction will take a bigger hit.

Right now, home loan borrowers can deduct the amount of interest they pay on their mortgages from their taxable income. This goes for principal residences and second homes. The interest deduction is capped at the first million dollars of debt on the home. For home equity loans it's capped at $100,000 in debt.

The deduction costs the U.S. Treasury about $100 billion a year. There are proposals now to either reduce the cap to $500,000 and/or to eliminate the deduction on second homes. Eliminating the deduction on second homes would save about $15 billion, and reducing the cap to $500,000 would save another $15 billion, according to economist William Wheaton at MIT. 10.5 percent of existing home sales in June were of homes over $500,000 according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Then there's the idea from the President' bipartisan commission of turning the interest deduction into a 12 percent credit, limited to $500,000 in mortgage debt, only on primary residences. That could save the Treasury $65 billion.

Obviously all this hits the middle class, urban borrowers the hardest because they're the ones with homes in the $500,000 to $1 million range. Realtors, home builders, investors, vacation home owners, even politicians hate these proposals, because they take money out of their pockets and because they provide a strong disincentive to buy a home right now. Then again, others argue that it just fosters over-borrowing, as potential homeowners see the deduction as making the loan less than it really is, which it doesn't.

Interesting, in Canada, they don't have a mortgage interest deduction on personal residences, but they do on investment properties; this makes a lot more sense to me, as it is a business expense. It also fosters investment in housing, which is precisely what the U.S. could use more of right now.

Of course if the US government defaults on its debt, the housing/mortgage markets will have a lot bigger issues to deal with than the potential loss of a tax deduction; like, say, mortgage rates going through the roof.

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Falling Mortgage Rates Spur Serial Refinancing

Andrew and Peggy Sheren can't resist a good deal, especially when it comes to financing their McLean, Virginia home.

"We’ve gone from an interest rate from something like greater than 6 percent down to the lowest interest rate we currently have is three and an eighth percent," Andrew remembers. They have refinanced their home four times in four years, taking equity out only the first time for a renovation, but essentially cutting their interest rate in half.

Negative economic reports of late have pushed the rate on the popular 30 year fixed to below 4.5 percent, the lowest this year and just about a quarter percent off the 50-year lows we saw last summer; adjustable-rate products are even lower. When investors see bad economic news, they pull money out of the stock market and park it in bonds. The price of bonds goes up, the yield goes down, and mortgage rates follow down.

"If we see continuing demand in mortgage backed securities, we’ll see further pushes lower. If we see continued doses of bad economic news, the stock market taking beatings, we don’t see positive economic news, continually bad jobs reports and previous months of jobs reports revised lower as we saw last week, then rates will continue to push down as we see that," says Craig Strent, CEO of Apex Home Loans, a small mortgage lender in Rockville, Maryland. Strent has seen a big surge in refinance requests in just the past few weeks. Nationwide, refinancings are climbing as well, while mortgage applications to purchase a home remain flat at very low levels. Strent, who obviously sells mortgages for a living, says regardless if you've already refinanced, you can still stand to save money over the long term.

"If you look at how much can I save in my interest costs and how much will it cost me to do it, and how long will it take me to breakeven and recover those costs? Am I going to be living there that long? And if the answer is yes, it’s going to make sense to refinance," advises Strent.

That's why the Sheren's keep going back to the table. They have gone from a fixed-rate loan to an adjustable rate mortgage on their Virginia home and have also refinanced the loan on a property they own in California. By making some changes to the loan value and term, they have been able to do this at little to no extra cost.

"We did a refinance in California where we actually got negative closing costs," boasts Andrew Sheren, adding, "I think that’s where we did pay half a point."

The trouble of course is that one in five borrowers owe more on their homes than their homes are currently worth. 10.9 million, or 22.7 percent of borrowers were in this negative equity position, or so-called "underwater," position at the end of March, according to a report out this morning from Core Logic, and while negative equity is improving in some of the hardest hit states, it is getting worse in states you might not expect. Nevada still has the highest rate of negative equity, but in New York, borrowers are underwater by the most, an average $129,000.

Being in a negative equity position makes it far tougher to refinance. There are government programs through Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the FHA which offer underwater borrowers a chance to refinance, but there are many qualifications that many borrowers don't meet. Some borrowers are choosing to do cash-in refinances, where they are putting more money into the mortgage, the opposite of what happened during the housing boom. This helps them get a better rate. Unfortunately, the borrower who need to refinance most, likely can't. But for those who can, it can make sense, over and over.

"Nobody gets rich, so far as I know, through refinancing, but what you do do is you save cash flow," says Andrew Sheren.

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Video Interlude: How Not to Pay the Mortgage: Build a 320-Square-Foot Home

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Wednesday, June 1, 2011, by Sarah Firshein

Screen-shot-2011-06-01-at-12.02.11-PM.jpgAs we've seen before, there's more than one way to not pay a mortgage. The billboard option is cool but temporary—after a number of months the payments return. But an Arkansas couple may have found a permanent solution to their inability to pay off their 2,000-square-foot home. "We looked at trailers [and] mobile homes, but to be honest those are $50,000, $60,000 dollars as well," explains Debra, one of the homeowners, in a video interview. We did not want to spend that kind of money on housing. We also thought of living in a shed." She and her husband, Gary, settled instead on a custom-designed 320-square-foot home that cost $15K, took only six weeks to build, and is now paid in full. "I was worried about other people would think," Debra says. "It's just not what people do—they don't live in 320-square-foot homes." Still, she points out, it's plenty of space for herself, her husband, and their 13-year-old son, not to mention full-size appliances, her china collection, and tall ceilings that help "contribute to the spacious feel." She adds poignantly, I've got everything I need right here."

Video: Shotgun shack redux: mortgage free in 320 square feet

· How Not to Pay the Mortgage: Turn Your House Into a Billboard! [Curbed National]
· Shotgun shack redux: mortgage free in 320 square feet [Fair Companies via Gawker]
· Shotgun shack redux: mortgage free in 320 square feet [YouTube]


View the original article here

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

The Debt Crisis and Mortgage Rates

If you're not talking about the head of the IMF today, then the only thing left really is the debt ceiling, which we officially reached today ($14.294 trillion for anyone who's counting).

While estimates are that it will take until August for the US to actually default on its debt obligations, the concern in the short term is how Wall Street sees the situation and how that will be reflected in the bond market and in mortgage interest rates.

So I asked a few experts:

Michael Barr/Fmr. Asst. Treasury Secretary for Financial Institutions

"If the US continues to bump up against the debt limit but Treasury uses "extraordinary measures" to keep the US from exceeding the limit, then the damage is likely to be modest and short-term. I would expect rates to rise, temporarily, by up to low single-digit basis points.

It is a bit hard to forecast exactly what the effect will be. Prior experience suggests low single digit bps, but there are a number of factors in play today that were not present in previous debt ceiling crises: fragile economy, fragile housing finance sector, fragile home prices and sales, F/F in conservatorship, no securitization to speak of, higher debt to GDP ratio, turmoil in Europe (exacerbated by DSK's arrest), extremely high levels of US dollar reserves already in China, extremely low Treasury rates.

Long term, if we actually default, it is simply devastating, and permanent."

Peter Boockvar/Miller Tabak:

"I think the market has spoken and the almost 50 bps drop in the 10 year note yield since mid April is clear evidence that the debt ceiling debate has had zero impact on market psychology. Everyone assumes that a deal of some sort will occur and the market impact will be nothing. More impactful in the direction of lower yields has been concerns with growth and a flight to safety due to renewed concerns with Europe."

Glenn Kelman, CEO Redfin

"We see people being very sensitive to the cost of money; they're very concerned about the debt crisis, they're very concerned about all these rumors that the US could have a money supply problem, so we think that interest rates are the real X factor to watch."

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner made it clear what would happen should the U.S. ultimately default:

"Because Treasurys represent the benchmark borrowing rate for all other sectors, default would raise all borrowing costs. Interest rates for state and local government, corporate and consumer borrowing, including home mortgage interest, would all rise sharply. Equity prices and home values would decline, reducing retirement savings and hurting the economic security of all Americans, leading to reductions in spending and investment, which would cause job losses and business failures on a significant scale."

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Realtors Face Off Against Mortgage Bankers

Yesterday I had the great opportunity to moderate a symposium on mortgage liquidity with a pretty heavy panel of mortgage bankers and industry executives.

I knew they would be guarded in their answers, as I asked about the new world of underwriting, the wind down of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the tighter more expensive FHA, new federal regulation in the industry and a controversial new appraisal process.

And they were guarded, until I opened up the floor to the Realtors, who hammered them hard on foreclosures, short sales, and mortgage credit for independent contractors like themselves.

A Realtor from Wilmington, NC asked what are the plans for companies to put the shadow (foreclosed) inventory onto the market? Most agents believe banks are holding on to these properties to somehow game the market, but the bankers were firm in their rebuttal:

Cara Heiden/Wells Fargo [WFC  Loading...      ()   ] : "With respect to shadow inventory, we are not holding on to properties. On average we do hold the REO about 160-70 days, but once they're listed they're sold in 90 days and the reason that we hold them for a period of time prior to listing is so that we can get them in better shape for sale and uphold, to the extent that we can, market values. So we're not holding other than for the purpose of getting that property to a level that does help maintain market values whenever possible."

Doug Jones/Bank of America [BAC  Loading...      ()   ] : "We too don't hold to have any market placement or timing. We need to clear inventory, so as soon as we go through that process, the property is marketed as an REO and we move it out."

...but when the President of the National Association of Realtors, Ron Phipps, pushed the bankers on short sales, that is selling a property for less than the value of the mortgage, it got a bit trickier....

Cara Heiden: "When we get the offer in and the paperwork is ready to go, our goal is 5-15 days ... "

[the crowd of over 1000 broke out into a huge wave of laughter at this because they don't buy that for a second]

...subject to our investors and what we're authorized to do.

Ron Phipps: "In the field our experience is we don't get responses in a timely fashion."

Cara Heiden: "I'll just say short sales are frustrating for you and they're frustrating for us."

She went on to defend that they are adding staff, training staff, working to improve, etc. But there was no winning that one.

A Realtor from Midland, TX asked why banks aren't giving incentives to investors to buy up REO (bank owned foreclosures) properties.

Mike Williams, the CEO of Fannie Mae, which currently holds over 153,000 REOs on its books, took the question: "Our first priority is to make sure we preserve the value of the property for the company and secondly for the community."

Williams then said they give occupants the first option and then go to the public entities, like the cities.

Once that's done, he added, "I can tell you that investors play a crucial role in our ability to market and sell our properties."

Williams noted that Fannie Mae will offer loans to investors for a maximum of ten investor properties, but couldn't go much beyond that.

A Realtor from Philadelphia, PA then told a story of one of her clients, a young couple who had bought condo in 2006 and then had a baby. They want to move out to the suburbs, but are underwater on their mortgage. They are employed and have excellent credit but are upset that a short sale would ruin their credit, making it impossible to get a mortgage for their next home.

Dave Stevens, former FHA commissioner and now president of the Mortgage Bankers Association: "The first concern on negative equity is people in distress. This is a tough example and I think there's a lot of silence on this panel because at some point someone would have to pay the loss on that write down and the question is, who do you want to pay? do you want the taxpayers to pay it? Do you want the banks to pay it? Or is there something that would say if you pay it can the banks also get a share of any upside that occurs in any future appreciation because it isn't a one way option when you make and investment decision."

I agree with him, and I couldn't help but add my own rant on borrowers trying to game the housing crash.

But things really got uncomfortable when a Realtor from Colorado, a single mother who is current on mortgages on her home and a few investment properties, but is struggling due to loss of income, begged the bankers to take her on; she claims she can't get help because she's self-employed, an independent contractor with a 1099.

"Come on guys, I am the perfect save right here," she said to much applause.

Doug Jones/Bank of America: "The industry and investors require documentation, our balance sheet requires documentation. It's a problem, I respect your situation, it's very very challenging. I am not going to say today or tomorrow we have a solution where we can't document income. We don't have a solution for that."

Questions?  Comments?  document.write("");document.write("RealtyCheck"+"@"+"cnbc.com");document.write('');And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick


View the original article here

Monday, May 9, 2011

AM Linkage: Beautiful Cherry Blossoms; SF Landmark Tattoo; Mortgage Woes; More!

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox.

View the original article here