Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Piece. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Piece. Show all posts

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Another Piece Of The Wreckage

Readers suggested a topic on the recent legal settlement. “Will ‘rough justice‘ suffice to lay the the robo-signing fiasco to rest?”

A reply, “This is a complete and total bank-friendly deal. My understanding is that they get 50% credit for writing down loans that they service but do not own. So they can write down say $20 billion of loans that they own and take the loss. Or they can write down $40 billion of loans that are owned by someone else, for example pension funds, and the pension funds take the loss. Anyone want to bet which they will do?”

“On top of that, once they convert these loans, they become taxpayer guaranteed. So if they still default, we pick up the tab, not the banks.”

“For the past few years, any time there’s any decision or policy or ruling that the government is going to make, I assume it will be for the benefit of the bankers, because they’re in charge. Bankers run the country, not Obama, not congress. I’ve been doing that, and so I’m never surprised. 100% of the time it’s for the bankers. If something also benefits the people, that’s only a coincidence.”

Another said, “It isn’t ‘justice’ at all. It’s another privileged buyout. NO prosecutions. No one held accountable. Just a fine. That’s right another ’settlement,’ without prosecution. Business goes on as usually, and, gee how draconian, after robbing the taxpayers of hundreds of billions of dollars, to quote the Post…..’$26 billion in return for a measure of legal immunity.’ I think it’s actual FULL legal immunity, but I wouldn’t expect the Post to be in favor of prosecutions or to present this theft of the American taxpayer as anything but really rough on the crooks. It’s their people who are on the ropes.”

One had this, “Real Estate valuations down 30% is kind of crash-ish. Yet the banks look good. A headline hit of $26 Billion also makes the banks look good, as if they were solvent. They are still paying big bonuses and people are demonstrating in the streets against the bank’s greed. It’s all good PR and in a perverse way gives us confidence in the financial system.”

And finally, “Not only does business go on as usual but if you read the article in the New York magazine last weekend they’re already whining that Frank-Dodd unjustly places too many limitations on them and they can’t make money anymore. Their plan now that everything is government guaranteed is to just keep pumping out the loans no matter what the risk. It appears they really do believe they can reinflate the bubble.”

“Man, when we finally do get to the crash that should have happened in 2001 pre all this credit pushing it is going to be ugly.”

“Aside from any monetary awards, I’m interested in whether or not some of this shadow inventory starts to be released, although we did find out yesterday GSE inventory is not included. Also I’m interested in hearing if anyone has an idea about how long will the delay be before we see it released?”

“Could it be that shadow inventory will soon be entered into the mix? Will it be a deluge or a trickle? In tight markets such as mine, will I even notice? Will it produce the never before seen in my market sheriff at the door?”

“Over the entire span of this experience, there have only been 2 homes we passed on thinking the prices would collapse more that we mourn the loss. Two out of hundreds we’ve looked at over years of watching the inventory. If another came our way I think we’d grab it this time. But more than likely it’ll be another year w/o seeing too much of anything. Why do I want to tie a noose around our necks for ‘meh’? Remember, this market can only move sideways. Jobs/incomes are not improving. Credit will not be any looser than it is today. The other people ‘grabbing’ those homes may be investors with cash who may be buying bulk at lower prices than you’d be allowed. I personally wouldn’t seek to compete with them.”

The Bay Citizen. “The Obama administration has pushed hard for the settlement, under which Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citibank and Ally Financial would pay billions of dollars to defrauded homeowners in exchange for a release from further civil liability. Approximately 750,000 borrowers who wrongfully lost their homes to foreclosure will receive $1,800 to $2,000 each, sources said.”

“Administration officials have said the settlement would also help about a million families get a $20,000 write-down on their mortgage. Members of California’s congressional delegation have said the deal represents little more than a ‘drop in the bucket’ for troubled borrowers. Nationwide, about 10 million American borrowers collectively owe $700 billion more on their homes than their homes are worth.”

“‘The amount of people the settlement is going to cover is going to be a tiny portion of the people harmed by the banks,’ said Tim iglesias, a professor of real estate law at the University of San Francisco.”

From WLS TV. “Illinois homeowners facing foreclosure will get a share of the $25 billion settlement reached with some of the nation’s biggest banks. The settlement commits the banks to reduce mortgage principals, refinance underwater mortgages and cash payouts to some who lost their homes. ‘Today we pick up another piece of the wreckage caused by the foreclosure crisis,’ Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said. ‘Today’s settlement should serve as a warning to financial institutions that there are consequences for engaging in practices that jeopardize the stability of our communities and our economy.’”

“Sherri Norris says she’s losing a three-year foreclosure fight for her Broadview condo. She hopes a new deal will help her move forward. ‘I’m hoping and praying it’s not too late,’ she said. ‘I’m just being prayerful.’”

“Geoff Smith, executive director of the Depaul’s Institute on Housing Studies, said he hopes the settlement brings relief to homeowners facing foreclosure. ‘If run effectively, it will help homeowners in distress but I don’t think we can really expect it to kick start the market,’ he said.”

“As that settlement trickles down to homeowners, Norris is preparing for an eviction, moving out and staying with relatives. ‘It’s very scary because you don’t’ know when they are going to come and bring the sheriffs in and tell you to come and move out,’ Norris said. ‘You just take one day at a time. It’s been very frustrating. (It) keeps you on pins and needles all the time.’”


View the original article here

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Arguing About Parking: It looks like a piece of...

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Tuesday, February 7, 2012, by Sally Kuchar

View the original article here

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Celebrity Real Estate: Inside Jennifer Aniston's Sleek New Piece of Starchitecture

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Tuesday, January 24, 2012, by Sarah Firshein

Looks like it's time to update the Celebrity Real Estate Heat Map: A-lister of A-listers Jennifer Aniston has reportedly scooped up new mansion for herself in Bel-Air, Calif. The pristine 8,500-square-foot four-bedroom was designed in 1965 by noted Los Angeles modernist architect A. Quincy Jones; after first hitting the market for $29M in 2008, the house was reduced to some $24M, at which point Aniston swooped in and scored it for even less: $21M. And as if this lucky lady didn't already have enough of them, here are yet some more perks: more than three acres of land, views of the city and ocean, a pool, a guesthouse, a wine cellar, and—last but certainly not least—a vineyard. Let's not forget to look inside: those distinctly midcentury-feeling interiors boasts gleaming wood floors, full-wall expanses of glass, and some pretty stunning fireplace detail.

Aniston's had quite an impressive year in terms of real estate. The actress listed and then sold her spectacular Ohana estate, a Beverly Hills beaut that was once featured on the cover of Architectural Digest. She swiftly found another Beverly Hills estate in which to shack up with new beau Justin Theroux. Let's not forget her East Coast accommodations, either: her new SoCal new pad is located just a plane ride away from her nest overlooking Central Park. In short: life looks pretty fine when you're her.

· All Jennifer Aniston coverage [Curbed National]
· JENNIFER ANISTON Buys SICKEST Mansion Ever!!! [TMZ]
· New to Market: A. Quincy Jones in Bel Air [Curbed LA]


View the original article here

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Auction Block: Would You Like to Own a Prime Piece of Clint Eastwood's Tehama?

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Friday, August 19, 2011, by Sally Kuchar In the 1960s, actor Clint Eastwood starting shelling out dough for plots of land in Carmel that eventually became a development project known as Tehama. Shoot forward to today, and fancy folks are more than willing to write a check for several million dollars so that they can snag a slice of Tehama and call it (vacation) home. Especially celebrities! They love it there. But not all is good in ultra swank Tehama. One of the area's prime lots—a 15.4-acre hilltop building site—is hitting the auction block. The property was previously listed for $3,450,000, but will be auctioned off with an opening bid of just $1,750,000. Local brokers are concerned that this will put a damper on Tehama's reputation for being a magnet to the rich. They'd prefer the seller, Gateway co-founder Norman Waitt, to wait it out and go through what they believe are the proper channels to secure a sale. Unfortunately for them that doesn't seem too likely, as the property is fit to go to auction on August 31. Do invite us over for a picnic.
· Tehama Carmel [official site]
· Auction Prompts Concern at Eastwood’s Carmel Development [WSJ]
· Carmel Auction [Sheldon Good & Company]
· Snag a Piece of Clint Eastwood's Wild West at August Auction [Curbed National]

View the original article here

Monday, August 29, 2011

On the Market: Snag a Piece of Clint Eastwood's Wild West at August Auction

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Friday, August 19, 2011, by Rob Bear

In the 1960s, actor Clint Eastwood began acquiring land in Carmel, Calif. that would eventually become a development project known as Tehama. Today, plots in that development are among the most sought after in this ritzy seaside escape some two hours south of San Francisco. But now local brokers are concerned that the auctioning of one of the area's prime lots—a 15.4-acre hilltop building site—may erode the cachet of this celeb-driven development. That home site, with its views of Carmel Bay and the surrounding hills, was previously listed for $3.45M, but will hit the auction block with an opening bid of just $1.75M. Adding fuel to the fire brokers are starting over this is the fact that the seller is not some disgraced Ponzi schemer, but wildly wealthy Gateway co-founder Norman Waitt, who would apparently just like to free himself of the headaches of a property lingering on the market. But, who knows, maybe a call from Dirty Harry himself will be enough to dissuade the computer king from cutting and running. That seems unlikely though, considering the auction is set for August 31.
· Tehama Carmel [official site]
· Auction Prompts Concern at Eastwood’s Carmel Development [WSJ]
· Carmel Auction [Sheldon Good & Company]


View the original article here

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Most Terrible: Vote Now: Least Favorite Piece of Public Art in San Francisco

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Monday, April 11, 2011, by Abby Pontzer

4-11-11worst.jpg["legs" via Nathan Hodges; "Cupid's Span" via Sergio; "UN Plaza Fountain" via Waldemar Horwat; "Vaillancourt Fountain via Bob Horowitz; "The Banker's Heart" via Dgies

The nominations are in! Here's what you, dear readers, nominated as some of your most cringe-worthy pieces of public art in the city. Go ahead, you know they bother you enough to click a vote button.
Your esteemed choices:

1. "Legs" at Embarcadero station. Also known as filthy rope thing, and misunderstood by many a passer-by as a mop used to clean the trains, this art was installed in the mid-1970s. Made out of flame-resistant fabric developed for firefighters, it was originally a bright orange. Years of train grime have turned it into a mess.
2. "Cupid's Span," along the Embarcadero. This piece gets a nod because it's "boring" and didn't live up to expectations of becoming a San Francisco icon. Not exactly a lot of wrath from readers, but certainly quite a few yawns.
3. The United Nations Plaza Fountain. It's in Mid-Market, so you know it gets a mention. Will it get cleaned up in the next push to revitalize Mid-Market? Or can we count on many shocked Twitterers as people continue to bathe and otherwise in a public fountain?
4. "Vaillancourt Fountain" at Justin Herman Plaza, aka "Quebec Libre." Also referred to as a "concrete carbuncle," this installation has been sitting and rusting ever since it was taken out of the shadow of the Embarcadero freeway.
5. "Transcendence," aka "The Banker's Heart" at 555 California. A big old piece of granite, which allows people to make fun of soulless bankers and lazy public art at the same time.

Every vote counts, so cast yours today! We'll announce the winner on Wednesday.


View the original article here