Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label control. Show all posts

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Turf Wars: With Rent Control for Yachtsmen in Peril, Greedy Sailors Push Back at New Marina Rules

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Thursday, February 23, 2012, by Philip Ferrato

2012_02_22_marinagreen-sirgious1.jpg
Fleet Week, Marina Green [Photo Credit: Sergio Ruiz]

In a new twist on three classic San Francisco turf wars- arguing over parking, rent control, and park use, tenants at San Francisco's Marina are unhappy with a draft set of proposed rental terms for slip spaces. Officially called the San Francisco Small Craft Yacht Harbor, the marina has a total of 691 boat slips (aka "berths") and according to Park & Rec's Phil Ginsberg, there are almost 200 people on the waiting list for slips. Previously, boat owners have been able to transfer leases to their slip in the sale of their boats. Making the boat much more valuable. In a nautical version of the teardown, some boats are believed to have been purchased only to acquire the lease.

New rules will end that practice. Owners are crying foul, complaining that transfer of the berth figured into their calculations for the cost of boat ownership. Of course, no one puts quite that cynical a spin on it, but that's what it comes down to, especially with new occupancy requirements, size limits, and a new no-sublet rule.

You can peruse the new rules (there's a link at the Rec & Parks site) with comprehension made easier by by Rec & Parks having simply crossed through the old terms and inserting the new. As for the America's Cup, which seems to elicit yawns from anyone without a oar in it, the slips- privately traded or just sublet for the race- could prove a windfall for current tenants. Meanwhile, Rec & Parks is faced with having to find revenue for infrastructure and maintenance all over town, in the face of opposition from a diverse range of NIMBYs, ranging from Telegraph Hill to San Mateo County's subsidized golfers at Sharp Park. And now, add boat owners to the list.
· Proposed S.F. Harbor-Berth Rules Rock the Boaters [SF Gate]
· San Francisco Small Craft Yacht Harbor [Rec & Parks]
· Coit Tower, NIMBY Beacon to The World [Curbed SF]
· Supes Can't Override Mayor's Veto of Sharp Park Deal [Curbed SF]


View the original article here

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Turf Wars: Controversy Surrounds Control of Iconic Rainbow Flag in the Castro

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Friday, June 10, 2011, by Sally Kuchar

6-10-11flag.jpgWe first got word that there was something fishy going on with the Castro's iconic rainbow flag back in April, when media outlets reported that the Merchants of Upper Market & Castro are in charge of the flag and refused to fly it at half-mast in respect to Elizabeth Taylor's passing.

According to the SF Appeal, controversy continues. A Castro/Upper Market Community Benefit District meeting was held yesterday to discuss whether to ask the Department of Public Works to convene a meeting on the flag.

The flagpole is on city land, but the merchants' association covers the insurance and maintenance of the rainbow flag. "As simple it may seem to have a gigantic flag there, it's not cheap," Supervisor Scott Wiener said. "It requires effort. The city does not have the resources to do this."

But Upper Market and Castro residents still question MUMC's authority over the flag. "There's been no public discussion about how MUMC managed to get control of city property that is important to the gay community around the world," said gay blogger and activist Michael Petrelis. Castro Benefit District executive director Andrea Aiello chimed in as well. "We understand MUMC owns it, but we want to have more community input," she said.
· Does Not Compute [Curbed SF]
· Controversy Over Control Of Castro's Rainbow Flag Continues To Mount [SF Appeal]
[Sundown in the Castro via JohnMinSF]


View the original article here

Friday, December 31, 2010

No one is in control


You can't control a sinking ship.

Recently the New York Times announced that the worm has turned for landlords.

Landlords Are Back in Control

TO the chagrin of many renters in New York City, the balance of power in the rental market has tipped back toward landlords — if not far enough for landlords to start celebrating quite yet.

At the beginning of the year, renters could demand and receive a month of free rent and maybe even get the landlord to pay their broker’s fees. Those concessions, now the exception rather than the rule, are mainly found in brand-new apartment towers whose owners are hoping to fill them quickly. Overall vacancy rates are again hovering around 1 percent, where they were during the boom. Some landlords have started to push for rent increases.

But it is not because of improvements in the rental market.

The true reason is that landlords are very aware of the current economic situation.

The New York City Independent Budget Office has projected slow employment growth in the city through 2011 and does not anticipate a return to pre-downturn levels until mid-2013.

The budget office’s data on the size of the city’s labor force, which includes everyone who is employed or looking for work, also mirror the strengthening rental market earlier in 2010 and the recent weakening. The size of the labor force had dropped through most of 2009 and had finally started to grow again in February 2010, approaching 4 million people. But the number fell by 14,000 in July, and in August grew by only about 2,000. (In August 2008, the last month before the economic meltdown, the city’s labor force grew by 7,500.)

Landlords who were emboldened to stop offering rental concessions earlier in the year “maybe were sensing the jobs picture improving and may have been reacting to that,” said Doug Turetsky, a spokesman for the budget office. The growing vacancy rate in August may also be a reaction to the falloff in the labor force in July, he said.

The reason why landlords were rolling out the red carpet and champagne for renters was that they needed to boost up their tenant base. The objective was to lock in as many people as possible and then pull the red carpet and end the party. And when renters realized that they can't go elsewhere because there are no deals out there and they were better off staying put.

What landlords are doing is textbook accounting. They are increasing their revenue, which is their rent and cutting back on their expenses which are all the concessions they presented in the past.

If you think they are being greedy or taking advantage of renters, they are not. They are actually scared out of their minds.

Job Loss Looms as Part of Stimulus Act Expires

Tens of thousands of people will lose their jobs within weeks unless Congress extends one of the more effective job-creating programs in the $787 billion stimulus act: a $1 billion New Deal-style program that directly paid the salaries of unemployed people so they could get jobs in government, at nonprofit organizations and at many small businesses.

Analyst: Wall St. layoff wave coming in '11

Pink slips will be coming back into fashion next year on Wall Street, one banking analyst is forecasting.

Meredith Whitney, whose reports trumpeting hard times for US banks were stunningly on target as early as 2007, said financial services firms could see as many as 80,000 job losses, or about 10 percent of current payrolls in the sector, between now and early 2012.

"Over the next 18 months, Wall Street will go through yet another iteration of resizing not seen since the post-dotcom era," Whitney recently told clients of her eponymous research firm, Meredith Whitney Advisory Group.

It is a simple equation. If you do not have a job, you are not going to be able to pay the rent let alone look for an apartment.

How New York City landlords are acting is a bell weather of the future of our economy and it should not be taken lightly.

All these developments probably explain my inbox getting carpet bombed with ads from Property Campaign.


Pendulum or noose?


View the original article here